|
Post by Webster on Jan 5, 2024 18:57:05 GMT -5
(The Guardian) Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House’s oversight committee, has criticized chairman James Comer’s announcement that the committee will vote to hold Hunter Biden in contempt of Congress next week, saying: There is no precedent for the US House of Representatives holding a private citizen in contempt of Congress who has offered to testify in public, under oath, and on a day of the committee’s choosing. Chairman Comer repeatedly urged Hunter Biden to appear at a committee hearing, and Hunter Biden agreed.
Instead of taking yes for an answer, Chairman Comer has now obstructed his own hapless investigation by denying Hunter Biden the opportunity to answer all the committee’s questions in front of the American people and the world.
Chairman Comer does not want Hunter Biden to testify in public, just as he has refused to publicly release over a dozen interview transcripts, because he wants to keep up the carefully curated distortions, blatant lies and laughable conspiracy theories that have marked this investigation. However, the facts and the evidence all show no wrongdoing and no impeachable offense by President Biden.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jan 8, 2024 19:30:13 GMT -5
(The Guardian) Republicans release resolution to hold Hunter Biden in contempt for not attending depositionThe Republican-led House oversight committee has released its resolution holding Hunter Biden in contempt of Congress for not attending a behind-closed-doors deposition in December. Despite receiving a subpoena, the president’s son demanded that any questioning by Congress be done in public, and instead made a brief statement to reporters outside the Capitol on the day the deposition was to occur. Hunter Biden is facing several federal charges related to lying in order to purchase a gun and failing to pay taxes. But Republicans have for years alleged he is at the center of a plot where his father Joe Biden benefited from corrupt business dealings overseas, even though they have turned up no proof of their allegations. In a report accompanying the resolution, the committee makes clear they planned to use whatever was learned from questioning Hunter Biden as part of their ongoing impeachment inquiry into the president. “Mr. Biden’s testimony is a critical component of the impeachment inquiry into, among other things, whether Joseph R. Biden, Jr., as Vice President and/or President: (1) took any official action or effected any change in government policy because of money or other things of value provided to himself or his family; (2) abused his office of public trust by providing foreign interests with access to him and his office in exchange for payments to his family or him; or (3) abused his office of public trust by knowingly participating in a scheme to enrich himself or his family by giving foreign interests the impression that they would receive access to him and his office in exchange for payments to his family or him,” the report reads. “Mr. Biden’s flagrant defiance of the Committees’ deposition subpoenas—while choosing to appear nearby on the Capitol grounds to read a prepared statement on the same matters—is contemptuous, and he must be held accountable for his unlawful actions.” The oversight and judiciary committees will consider the contempt resolution on Wednesday.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jan 10, 2024 17:53:42 GMT -5
(The Guardian) Republicans caught off guard after Hunter Biden turns up at hearing to hold him in contemptHouse Republicans clearly did not expect Hunter Biden to appear in person for an oversight committee hearing where they are considering whether to hold him in contempt of Congress. The president’s son is accused of defying a subpoena to testify behind closed doors, though Republicans have made separate and unproven allegations that he engaged in corrupt foreign business dealings. After walking into the hearing room, Republican Nancy Mace laid into him, prompting objections from Democrats. “Who bribed Hunter Biden to be here today? That’s my first question,” began Mace in the first remarks by a lawmaker directed at Biden since he arrived in the room. “Second question: You are the epitome of white privilege coming into the oversight committee, spitting in our face, ignoring a congressional subpoena to be deposed. What are you afraid of? You have no balls to come up here.” At that last comment, Biden appeared to wave his hand in a sign of exasperation. Democrats were not happy with that line of questioning, with one lawmaker responding, “if the gentlelady wants to hear from Hunter Biden, we can hear from him right now. Mr. Chairman, let’s take a vote and hear from Hunter Biden.” That would fly in the face of the GOP’s tactics when dealing with Biden. They had demanded he be deposed in private, but on the day that was to happen, the president’s son instead appeared at the Capitol and told reporters he would only testify publicly. While Republicans have yet to turn up proof for their allegations that Joe Biden benefited from corrupt business dealings overseas, Hunter Biden is facing several federal charges related to failing to pay taxes and lying to buy a gun.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jan 30, 2024 13:56:48 GMT -5
(The Guardian) Homeland security chief Mayorkas decries 'false accusations' as Republicans kick off impeachment bidHouse Republicans are finally following through on their much-discussed push to impeach the homeland security secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, who they blame for mishandling security on the southern border. Beginning at 10am ET, the House homeland security committee will consider two articles of impeachment against Mayorkas, and, assuming they approve them, a vote by the full House of Representatives could come next week. This is unlikely to be a process that results in Mayorkas losing his job. Impeachments of cabinet secretaries are rare, and even if the House approves the charges, the Democratic-controlled Senate has shown no interest in pursuing his conviction. In a seven-page letter to the committee’s Republican chair, Mark Green, released today, Mayorkas defended his handling of the surge in migrants arriving from Mexico, and told Green that his “false accusations do not rattle me”. Meanwhile, we are still waiting for the details of a legislative compromise to tighten immigration policy in a way that would reduce the number of migrants entering the country, which Republicans say they want passed in exchange for their votes for aid to Ukraine and Israel, though it’s unclear if even that will be enough. Mayorkas not the only target of House impeachment campaignIt’s not just the homeland security chief Alejandro Mayorkas that House Republicans are going after. The party is also considering impeaching Joe Biden for alleged corruption, but that effort appears to be on the backburner at the moment, perhaps because lawmakers have not turned up any proof of their allegations. Last month, Republicans held a vote on the House floor to authorize the investigation, months after a disastrous hearing in which their own witnesses said they did not know if the president broke the law. It’s unclear when the House GOP’s next move will occur. Both the Biden and Mayorkas impeachments suffer from the same problem: uncertainty over whether the GOP has the votes in the House to impeach both men. Regardless, any impeachment article sent to the Senate are expected to quickly be rejected by the chamber’s Democratic majority, which has shown no sign of wanting to convict their own president, or his deputies.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jan 31, 2024 15:52:50 GMT -5
(The Guardian) As effort against Mayorkas moves ahead, White House asks, “Is there anyone House Republicans won’t impeach?”In the wee hours of this morning, the Republican-controlled House homeland security committee approved the charges against Alejandro Mayorkas by a party line vote and sent them for consideration by the full chamber. House speaker Mike Johnson is expected to hold a vote on impeaching the homeland security chief at some point next week, though with a margin of just one seat (!) it’s going to be interesting to see if any GOP lawmakers defect from the effort. Even the charges are approved, the impeachment is headed for a trial in the Senate that will likely prove futile. Democrats control the chamber, and convicting Mayorkas of the “high crimes and misdemeanors” he is accused of requires a two-thirds majority, which is likely unobtainable. The White House is nonetheless peeved by the committee’s action, describing it as petty and noting that Republicans have talked about impeaching Joe Biden and various officials ever since he took office. “Is there anyone House Republicans won’t impeach?” read an email from the White House press team this morning.
The House homeland security committee convened at 10am yesterday, but it took them until 1am this morning to finally approve the articles of impeachment against Alejandro Mayorkas, after hours of debate on various amendments offered by both parties. Here’s a recap the marathon hearing, and what happens next: House Republicans voted along party lines after midnight on Wednesday to move toward impeaching the homeland security secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, for a “willful and systematic” refusal to enforce immigration laws as border security becomes a top 2024 election issue.
In a charge against a cabinet official unseen in nearly 150 years, the homeland security committee debated all day on Tuesday and well into the night before recommending two articles of impeachment against Mayorkas to the full House.
The committee Republicans voted in favor, while the Democrats unified against, 18-15.
The partisan showdown reflected the Republicans’ efforts to make the Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump’s hard-line deportation approach to immigration their own. That approach was mirrored on a second front on Tuesday, as Republicans also lambasted the border deal recently brokered between the Joe Biden White House and a bipartisan group of senators, Democrats and Republicans alike.
Mayorkas, in a letter sent to the Republican chair of the House committee on homeland security before the hearing began, dismissed the impeachment process against him as “politically motivated”.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Jan 31, 2024 16:42:25 GMT -5
(The Guardian) James Biden will appear before House Republicans for a private interview next month as lawmakers seek to regain some momentum in their monthslong impeachment inquiry into his brother, Joe Biden, The Associated Press reports. The House Oversight and Accountability Committee announced on Wednesday that the Democratic president’s younger sibling will come to Capitol Hill on February 21. The date was set after months of negotiations between the sides. -- We look forward to his interview,” the committee posted on X, the website formerly known as Twitter.James Biden’s interview will take place just days before the president’s son Hunter Biden will be deposed in private by the Republican-run committee, which has been investigating the Biden family’s overseas finances for the past year. Both James and Hunter Biden were subpoenaed by the committee in November. So far, the GOP investigation has failed to uncover evidence directly implicating the president in any wrongdoing. A lawyer for James Biden said at the time that there was no justification for the subpoena because the committee had already reviewed private bank records and transactions between the two brothers. The committee found records of two loans that were made when Joe Biden was not in office or a candidate for president. -- There is nothing more to those transactions, and there is nothing wrong with them. And Jim Biden has never involved his brother in his business dealings,” lawyer Paul Fishman said in a statement in November.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Feb 21, 2024 18:50:25 GMT -5
(The Guardian) Informant's connection to Russian intelligence tangles House GOP's push to impeach BidenFor months, Republicans in the House of Representatives have been inching forward with an effort to impeach Joe Biden for alleged corruption. They have been particularly fixated on his son Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings, but the case against the president was dealt a major blow in recent days, after federal prosecutors brought charges against the former FBI informant Alexander Smirnov. The GOP fixated on Smirnov’s claims that both Bidens received bribes from a Ukrainian energy company, but prosecutors say those were fabricated. In another filing yesterday, the plot unraveled further: Smirnov allegedly had contacts with Russian intelligence, the government said. What does all this mean for Republicans? The Biden impeachment effort hasn’t exactly been a top priority in recent months, and isn’t going to get the president out of office – Democrats control the Senate, and are sure to reject the charges. Congress is out, but Biden’s Republican antagonists in the House such as the oversight committee chair, James Comer, and the judiciary committee chair, Jim Jordan, will be pressed to react to the Smirnov affair – we’ll let you know if we hear from them today. Russian intelligence link to Hunter Biden allegations emerged after prosecutors' attempted to keep Smirnov in jailFederal prosecutors revealed the connection between Russian intelligence and the former FBI informant Alexander Smirnov yesterday, when they argued that Smirnov should be detained while he awaited trial on charges related to lying to the FBI. In a court document, prosecutors said that Smirnov revealed Russian intelligence’s involvement during a 14 February interview, when he was arrested in Las Vegas after returning to the United States from overseas. However, the line is vague – it does not specify exactly what information Moscow spread about Hunter Biden. “During his custodial interview on February 14, Smirnov admitted that officials associated with Russian intelligence were involved in passing a story about” Biden, the filing says, without elaborating. The Associated Press reports that a judge allowed Smirnov to be released on bail while awaiting trial, and is being monitored by an electronic GPS device.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Feb 21, 2024 18:51:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Feb 21, 2024 18:52:01 GMT -5
(The Guardian) 'It is what it is,' Republican impeachment leader says of Russian intelligence revelationThe Republican House judiciary committee chair, Jim Jordan, downplayed revelations from the former FBI informant Alexander Smirnov that Russian intelligence had passed him “a story” about Hunter Biden. “It is what it is,” Jordan told reporters, when asked about Smirnov’s statement to the FBI following his arrest in Las Vegas earlier this month. Jordan, whose committee is leading the impeachment investigation into the president, then went on to insist that evidence shows corruption by Joe Biden and his son, though none of what Republican investigators have turned up actually proves that.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Feb 21, 2024 18:57:54 GMT -5
(The Guardian) The House GOP’s impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden has moved forward at the same time that a justice department special counsel brought charges against the president’s son for allegedly evading taxes and lying while buying a gun. But as the Guardian’s Edward Helmore reports, lawyers for Hunter Biden argue evidence in his case has been misinterpreted by prosecutors: Lawyers for Hunter Biden have claimed that a picture government prosecutors are using to support a tax fraud case against him shows neatly arranged lines of sawdust from a carpentry shop – and not cocaine as the government contends.
Joe Biden’s son is facing tax evasion charges for failing to disclose millions in foreign income and a charge for failing to disclose he was a drug addict on gun licensing forms. He claims that use of the picture shows that prosecutors’ evidence against him should not be taken at face value.
The potential mix-up “sounds more like a storyline from one of the 1980’s Police Academy comedies than what should be expected in a high-profile prosecution”, Hunter Biden’s attorney Abbe Lowell wrote in a court filing.
Lowell said that the government was “flat-out wrong” to claim that Biden took the photograph or that it showed cocaine. Instead, Lowell said, “this is actually a photo of sawdust from an expert carpenter and it was sent to Mr Biden, not vice versa”. The photo was from a master carpenter and “coke addict” that Biden’s psychiatrist had sent to his patient to “convey that Mr Biden, too, could overcome any addiction”.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Feb 21, 2024 19:15:06 GMT -5
(The Guardian) James Biden says his brother was never involved in his business ventures - reportIn his opening statement to the House lawmakers leading the impeachment charge against Joe Biden, his brother James Biden said the president has never been involved in his business dealings, the Washington Post reports. The testimony rebuts Republican claims that Joe Biden has used his official positions to assist his relatives and profit corruptly from their business dealings. “I have had a 50-year career in a variety of business ventures,” James Biden told the House oversight committee at his behind-closed-doors deposition today. “Joe Biden has never had any involvement or any direct or indirect financial interest in those activities. None.”
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Feb 21, 2024 19:17:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Feb 28, 2024 13:42:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Feb 28, 2024 13:44:35 GMT -5
(The Guardian) Hunter Biden says father was 'never' involved in businesses, attacks 'partisan political pursuit of my dad' - reportIn his opening statement to the House oversight and judiciary committees, Hunter Biden said his father has “never” been involved in any of his business ventures, and decried the GOP’s campaign to impeach Joe Biden over unproven claims of corruption. “I am here today to provide the Committees with the one uncontestable fact that should end the false premise of this inquiry: I did not involve my father in my business. Not while I was a practicing lawyer, not in my investments or transactions domestic or international, not as a board member, and not as an artist. Never,” Hunter Biden said in the statement obtained by Punchbowl News. He then went on to attack the GOP for its pursuit of his father: For more than a year, your Committees have hunted me in your partisan political pursuit of my dad. You have trafficked in innuendo, distortion, and sensationalism – all the while ignoring the clear and convincing evidence staring you in the face. You do not have evidence to support the baseless and MAGA-motivated conspiracies about my father because there isn’t any.
Hunter Biden took particular umbrage at the GOP’s reliance on discredited sources to attack him and his father. The weaknesses of some of the evidence Republicans have used to claim corruption on his part and Joe Biden’s became apparent earlier this month when Alexander Smirnov, a former FBI informant, was indicted for lying to the government, and prosecutors later revealed that information he had provided about Hunter Biden came from Russian intelligence. Here’s what Biden told the oversight and judiciary committees about that: You have built your entire partisan house of cards on lies told by the likes of Gal Luft, Tony Bobulinski, Alexander Smirnov and Jason Galanis. Luft, who is a fugitive, has been indicted for his lies and other crimes; Smirnov, who has made you dupes in carrying out a Russian disinformation campaign waged against my father, has been indicted for his lies; Bobulinski, who has been exposed for the many false statements he has made, and Galanis, who is serving 14 years in prison for fraud. Rather than follow the facts as they have been laid out before you in bank records, financial statements, correspondence and other witness testimony, you continue your frantic search to prove the lies you, and those you rely on, keep peddling. Yes, they are lies.
|
|
|
Post by Webster on Feb 28, 2024 13:46:17 GMT -5
|
|